中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 19-23.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

淋巴免疫治疗成人特应性皮炎临床疗效及安全性

雍磊1,高春芳1,程相铎1,李华信2,李小红3,李珂1,王俊琪1,李红文4   

  1. 1. 中国人民解放军第150中心医院
    2. 河南省洛阳市解放军第150中心医院检验科
    3. 郑州大学第一附属医院
    4. 郑州大学附属第一医院皮肤科
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-19 修回日期:2014-11-24 发布日期:2019-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 李红文 E-mail:yfylhw@sina.com

Clinical efficacy and safety of intralymphatic immunotherapy for adult atopic dermatitis

  • Received:2014-09-19 Revised:2014-11-24 Published:2019-06-12

摘要: 目的 探讨淋巴免疫治疗成人特应性皮炎的疗效及安全性。 方法 85例特应性皮炎患者按3 ∶ 2分为皮下注射组51例,淋巴注射组34例,淋巴注射组患者分别于0、4、8、12、16、20周行超声引导下腹股沟淋巴结内注射屋尘螨过敏原制剂,除0周用药剂量为100标准化质量单位(SQ-U)外,其余5次剂量均为1 000 SQ-U;皮下注射组患者皮下注射上述过敏原制剂在剂量累加阶段每周注射1次,剂量从20 SQ-U逐次增加,16周达维持量80 000 SQ-U,然后以维持量每4周皮下注射1次,维持阶段52周,总疗程68周。两组患者分别在治疗前及治疗后16周、20周、68周进行特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD),在治疗前和治疗后68周分别进行药物用量评分和血清屋尘螨特异性IgE(sIgE)、sIgG4检测,对比分析两种方案的疗效。记录不良反应。 结果 淋巴注射组32例、皮下注射组31例完成了治疗,淋巴注射组患者的依从性显著高于皮下注射组(P < 0.01)。两组患者治疗后SCORAD均显著降低,但淋巴注射组患者治疗较早(16周)显示SCORAD改善,重复测量数据方差分析显示淋巴注射组在SCORAD改善方面总体优于皮下注射组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。两组治疗后(68周)用药评分和血清屋尘螨sIgE均显著低于治疗前(P < 0.01),屋尘螨sIgG4治疗后两组均显著升高,与治疗前相比,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。 皮下注射组5例在1 024次皮下注射过程中,12次注射时发生了全身不良反应,其中Ⅰ级8次,Ⅱ级4次,无Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级严重不良反应;淋巴注射组进行了198次淋巴结内注射,无全身不良反应发生。 结论 屋尘螨过敏原淋巴免疫治疗特应性皮炎,缩短了疗程,增加了患者依从性、疗效显著,且较为安全。

关键词: 皮炎,特应性, 尘螨科, 淋巴结, 免疫法,被动

Abstract: Yong Lei, Gao Chunfang, Cheng Xiangduo, Li Huaxin, Li Xiaohong, Li Ke, Wang Junqi, Li Hongwen*. *Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China Corresponding author: Li Hongwen, Email: yfylhw@sina.com 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralymphatic immunotherapy in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. Methods Eighty-five patients were enrolled into this study, and divided into intralymphatic injection group (n = 34) receiving ultrasound-guided injections of standardized house dust mite allergens into inguinal lymph nodes at week 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20, and subcutaneous injection group (n = 51) receiving subcutaneous injections of the same standardized allergens for 68 weeks. The dose of house dust mite allergens in the intralymphatic injection group was 100 standardized quality units (SQ-U) on week 0, and 1 000 SQ-U at the following time points, while the standardized allergens were injected once weekly in the subcutaneous injection group during the dose-accumulative stage with the dose gradually increasing from 20 to 80 000 SQ-U at week 16, and once every 4 weeks during the following 52-week maintenance stage with the dose maintaining at 80 000 SQ-U. Scoring Atopic Dermatitis(SCORAD) index was determined at the baseline and week 16, 20, and 68 after starting treatment. The amount of other drugs (such as antihistamines, glucocorticosteroids, etc) used was scored, and serum levels of house dust mite-specific IgE (sIgE) and sIgG4 were measured at the baseline and after 68-week treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded. Results Thirty-two patients in the intralymphatic injection group and 31 patients in the subcutaneous injection group completed the study, with the compliance rate in the former group significantly higher than that in the latter group (P < 0.01). SCORAD index was markedly decreased in both groups after treatment, but the intralymphatic injection group showed an earlier decrease at week 16, and repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that the intralymphatic injection group was superior to the subcutaneous injection group in general improvement of SCORAD index. The score for amount of drugs used and serum levels of sIgE were both significantly decreased, while the serum levels of sIgG4 significantly increased in both groups at week 68 compared with those before starting treatment (all P < 0.01). Five patients in the subcutaneous injection group reported systemic adverse reactions to 12 out of 1 024 injections, including 8 cases of grade I reactions and 4 cases of grade Ⅱ reactions, while no systemic adverse reaction was reported in the intralymphatic injection group who received a total of 198 injections. Conclusions Intralymphatic immunotherapy with house dust mite allergen can greatly shorten treatment duration, increase treatment compliance with marked efficacy and a good safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Key words: Dermatitis, atopic, Pyroglyphidae, Lymph nodes, Immunization, passive

引用本文

雍磊 高春芳 程相铎 李华信 李小红 李珂 王俊琪 李红文. 淋巴免疫治疗成人特应性皮炎临床疗效及安全性[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2015,48(1):19-23. doi: