中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 467-474.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4030.2019.07.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京31例20 ~ 25岁健康在校女大学生面部主观皮肤类型与皮肤微生物的关系

郑玉梅    吴文海    宋丽雅    何聪芬   

  1. 北京工商大学理学院  北京市植物资源研究开发重点实验室  100048
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-10 修回日期:2019-03-29 出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 宋丽雅 E-mail:songly@th.btbu.edu.cn

Relationship between subjective facial skin types and skin microbiota in 31 healthy female undergraduates aged 20 - 25 years in Beijing

Zheng Yumei, Wu Wenhai, Song Liya, He Congfen   

  1. School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing Key Lab of Plant Resources Research and Development, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2018-09-10 Revised:2019-03-29 Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-07-01
  • Contact: Song Liya E-mail:songly@th.btbu.edu.cn

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 利用高通量测序技术研究北京地区20 ~ 25岁健康女性皮肤细菌、真菌的物种组成,并比较4种不同主观皮肤类型微生物组成和多样性的差异。方法 在北京工商大学招募31例在校女学生,按受试者对面部皮肤油腻及干燥程度的主观感受将其分为干性(6例)、中性(8例)、混合性(9例)、油性(8例)4组,于2017年12月24日检测受试者皮肤水分含量、经皮水分丢失、油脂含量、pH值,比较不同自评皮肤类型皮肤生理指标的差异。用棉拭子采集面颊皮肤样本,提取DNA及PCR扩增后,进行细菌16S rRNA V1 - V2区和真菌内源转录间隔区1 - 2测序,并根据97%的相似度对序列进行OTU聚类和物种分类注释。采用单因素方差分析进行多组间比较,LSD?t检验进行两两多重比较。结果 4组受试者面部皮肤油脂含量和细菌多样性均存在差异,干性、中性、混合性、油性皮肤油脂含量分别为(5.50 ± 4.60)、(7.69 ± 5.26)、(10.56 ± 5.42)、(22.81 ± 8.53) μg/cm2,F = 11.685,P < 0.001;细菌多样性(Shannon指数)分别为3.49 ± 0.70、2.97 ± 1.43、2.49 ± 0.63、1.59 ± 0.59,F = 5.634,P = 0.004。丙酸杆菌属、葡萄球菌属和链球菌属为主要菌群,其中,油性皮肤组丙酸杆菌属相对丰度(68.24% ± 14.78%)显著高于干性组(18.83% ± 14.49%)、中性组(32.18% ± 36.29%)和混合性组(35.22% ± 22.58%),均P < 0.001。此外,葡萄球菌属相对丰度在混合性皮肤中最高,而链球菌属相对丰度在中性皮肤中最高。4组皮肤真菌多样性和丰富度(Chao指数)差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。4组真菌主要由子囊菌门和担子菌门组成,且相对丰度在4组间差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05),丰度大于1%的真菌属差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论 年轻女性不同主观皮肤类型面颊皮肤生理指标和细菌多样性均存在一定差异,而真菌多样性和丰富度无显著性差异,提示主观皮肤类型与皮肤细菌定植相关。

关键词: 皮肤, 微生物群落, 细菌, 真菌, 主观皮肤类型, 高通量测序

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the composition of bacteria and fungi on the facial skin of healthy women aged 20 - 25 years in Beijing by using high-throughput sequencing technology, and to compare the composition and diversity of microbes among 4 kinds of subjective skin types. Methods Totally, 31 female undergraduates were enrolled from Beijing Technology and Business University, and classified into 4 groups, including dry skin group (n = 6), neutral skin group (n = 8), mixed skin group (n = 9) and oily skin group (n = 8), according to their subjective feeling of facial skin greasiness and dryness. On 24th December 2017, the facial skin water content, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), sebum content and pH value were determined for these undergraduates, and these physiological parameters of the skin were compared among the 4 kinds of subjective skin types. Skin samples were collected with swabs from the cheeks of these subjects. After DNA extraction and PCR amplification, the bacterial 16S rRNA regions V1-V2 and fungal internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (ITS-1-ITS-2) were sequenced separately, and sequences were grouped by OUT cluster analysis at 97% sequence similarity followed by classification and annotation of species. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup comparison, and least significant difference (LSD)-t test for multiple comparison. Results The sebum content and bacterial diversity of the facial skin both significantly differed among the 4 kinds of subjective skin types. The skin sebum content in the dry skin group, neutral skin group, mixed skin group and oily skin was 5.50 ± 4.60 μg/cm2, 7.69 ± 5.26 μg/cm2, 10.56 ± 5.42 μg/cm2, 22.81 ± 8.53 μg/cm2 respectively (F = 11.685, P < 0.001), and the Shannon index of bacterial diversity in the above 4 groups was 3.49 ± 0.70, 2.97 ± 1.43, 2.49 ± 0.63 and 1.59 ± 0.59 respectively (F = 5.634, P = 0.004). Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus were the main bacterial florae on the face. The relative abundance of Propionibacterium was significantly higher in the oily skin group (68.24% ± 14.78%) than in the dry skin group (18.83% ± 14.49%, P < 0.001), neutral skin group (32.18% ± 36.29%, P < 0.001) and mixed skin group (35.22% ± 22.58%, P < 0.001). In addition, the relative abundance of Staphylococcus was highest in the mixed skin group, and the relative abundance of Streptococcus was highest in the neutral skin group. There was no significant difference in the fungal diversity (Shannon index) or richness (Chao index) among the 4 groups (both P > 0.05). The fungi on the facial skin of these subjects mainly consisted of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, and no significant difference in their relative abundance was observed among the 4 groups (both P > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the composition of fungal genera at relative abundance > 1% among the 4 groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The physiological parameters and bacterial diversity of the cheek skin differed among young women of different subjective skin types, while there was no difference in the fungal diversity or richness, suggesting that the colonization of skin bacteria is associated with subjective skin types.

Key words: Skin, Microbial consortia, Bacteria, Fungi, Subjective skin types, High-throughput sequencing