中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2026, e20250616.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20250616

• 论著 •    

3胍基丙酸抑制黑色素瘤细胞的迁移及其潜在机制研究

刘晨杰    何进康    李佳奕    王凯    马鹏程    李弘扬    李玲珺   

  1. 北京协和医学院  中国医学科学院  皮肤病医院  皮肤病研究所,南京  210042
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-03 修回日期:2026-04-22 发布日期:2026-05-29
  • 通讯作者: 李玲珺 E-mail:lilj@pumcderm.cams.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82003808,81602788)

Effects of 3-guanidinopropionic acid on the migration of melanoma cells and its potential mechanisms

Liu Chenjie, He Jinkang, Li Jiayi, Wang Kai, Ma Pengcheng, Li Hongyang, Li Lingjun   

  1. Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2025-11-03 Revised:2026-04-22 Published:2026-05-29
  • Contact: Li Lingjun E-mail:lilj@pumcderm.cams.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82003808,81602788)

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 探究肌酸转运体溶质载体家族6成员8(SLC6A8)抑制剂3胍基丙酸(β-GPA)对黑色素瘤细胞A375和SK-MEL-28的细胞迁移影响及其潜在机制。方法 用0(对照组)、1、5、10、20、40、80、100、200 mmol/L β-GPA作用于黑色素瘤A375和SK-MEL-28细胞24 h,通过细胞计数试剂盒(CCK8)法检测β-GPA对黑色素瘤细胞的增殖抑制作用;选择0(对照组)、10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA作用于黑色素瘤A375和SK-MEL-28细胞,通过Transwell实验和划痕实验分别考察β-GPA对黑色素瘤细胞迁移能力的影响;以0(对照组)和20 mmol/L β-GPA作用A375细胞24 h,通过转录组学测序检测对照组与给药组的基因表达差异,并通过京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路富集分析并结合蛋白质印迹实验验证0、10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA对应激活化蛋白激酶(JNK)通路的调控作用;构建C57BL/6小鼠黑色素瘤肺转移模型,评估β-GPA对黑色素瘤转移的治疗作用,实验分为4组:对照组、100 mg/kg β-GPA组、500 mg/kg β-GPA组以及30 mg/kg达拉非尼(阳性对照)组。多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,结合Dunnett's事后检验。结果 CCK8结果显示,β-GPA对A375和SK-MEL-28细胞的半数抑制浓度(IC50)分别为(58.63 ± 3.74) mmol/L、(76.38 ± 1.35) mmol/L,该药物对黑色素瘤细胞的增殖抑制作用具有浓度依赖性(均P < 0.001); Transwell实验结果显示,在A375细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理组的A375细胞迁移数(47.00 ± 2.65、38.33 ± 1.53和32.67 ± 0.58)均显著低于对照组(86.67 ± 2.31,均P < 0.01),在SK-MEL-28细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理组的细胞迁移数(68.33 ± 3.51、55.33 ± 4.16和49.67 ± 2.52)均显著低于对照组(89.67 ± 2.52,均P < 0.01);划痕实验结果显示,在A375细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理12 h 的A375细胞迁移距离[(93.22 ± 7.64) μm、(66.38 ± 10.66) μm和(64.27 ± 6.81) μm]均显著低于对照组[(132.10 ± 11.67) μm,均P < 0.01],10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理24 h 的A375细胞迁移距离[(169.50 ± 8.48) μm、(141.20 ± 14.88) μm 和(88.98 ± 4.24) μm]均显著低于对照组[(238.00 ± 7.44) μm,均P < 0.001];在SK-MEL-28细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理12 h的SK-MEL-28细胞迁移距离[(115.80 ± 7.61) μm、(123.20 ± 5.47) μm和(97.88 ± 9.12) μm]均显著低于对照组[(203.00 ± 21.40) μm,均P < 0.01],10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理24 h的SK-MEL-28细胞迁移距离[(212.90 ± 2.88) μm、(220.60 ± 8.90) μm和(187.90 ± 21.74) μm]显著低于对照组[(348.40 ± 15.71) μm,均P < 0.001]。转录组学测序结果显示,β-GPA对雌激素、磷脂酶D和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)等信号通路具有显著的调控作用。蛋白质印迹实验结果显示,在A375细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理组的磷酸化JNK(p-JNK)蛋白相对表达量(0.88 ± 0.06、0.85 ± 0.08、0.69 ± 0.07)均显著低于对照组(1.00 ± 0.07,均P < 0.05);在SK-MEL-28细胞中,10、20、40 mmol/L β-GPA处理组的p-JNK蛋白相对表达量(0.75 ± 0.09、0.52 ± 0.08、0.50 ± 0.09)均显著低于对照组(1.00 ± 0.06,均P < 0.05)。C57BL/6小鼠黑色素瘤肺转移模型体内实验结果显示,100 mg/kg β-GPA组、500 mg/kg β-GPA组以及30 mg/kg达拉非尼组的黑色素瘤结节数量(分别为7.33 ± 0.76、3.33 ± 1.02、5.17 ± 1.08)均显著低于对照组(17.17 ± 1.07,均P < 0.001)。结论 β-GPA可抑制黑色素瘤细胞的细胞迁移,其机制可能与抑制JNK信号通路有关。

关键词: 黑色素瘤, 3胍基丙酸, 丝裂原活化蛋白激酶, 细胞增殖, 肿瘤迁移

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effects of the solute carrier family 6 member 8 (SLC6A8) inhibitor 3-guanidinopropionic acid (β-GPA) on the migration of melanoma cell lines A375 and SK-MEL-28 and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Methods Melanoma A375 and SK-MEL-28 cells were treated with β-GPA at concentrations of 0 (control group), 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 mmol/L for 24 h. The inhibitory effects of β-GPA on melanoma cell proliferation were evaluated using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. To investigate the effects of β-GPA on melanoma cell migration, A375 and SK-MEL-28 cells were treated with 0 (control group), 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA, and migration ability was assessed using Transwell migration assays and wound-healing assays. A375 cells were treated with 0 (control group) or 20 mmol/L β-GPA for 24 h, and transcriptome sequencing was performed to identify differentially expressed genes between the control and treatment groups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis was conducted, and Western blot analysis was further used to verify the regulatory effects of 0, 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA on the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway. The C57BL/6 mouse melanoma lung metastasis model was established to evaluate the therapeutic effects of β-GPA on melanoma metastasis. The mice were divided into 4 groups: control group, 100 mg/kg β-GPA group, 500 mg/kg β-GPA group, and 30 mg/kg dabrafenib group (positive control). Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett′s post hoc test. Results CCK-8 assays showed that the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of β-GPA for A375 and SK-MEL-28 cells were 58.63 ± 3.74 mmol/L and 76.38 ± 1.35 mmol/L, respectively. β-GPA inhibited melanoma cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner (both P < 0.001). Transwell migration assays demonstrated that, in A375 cells, the numbers of migrated cells in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (47.00 ± 2.65, 38.33 ± 1.53, and 32.67 ± 0.58, respectively) were all significantly lower than that in the control group (86.67 ± 2.31, all P < 0.01). In SK-MEL-28 cells, the numbers of migrated cells in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (68.33 ± 3.51, 55.33 ± 4.16, and 49.67 ± 2.52, respectively) were also significantly lower than that in the control group (89.67 ± 2.52, all P < 0.01). Wound-healing assays showed that, in A375 cells, migration distances at 12 h after treatment with 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA (93.22 ± 7.64 μm, 66.38 ± 10.66 μm, and 64.27 ± 6.81 μm, respectively) were significantly shorter than that in the control group (132.10 ± 11.67 μm, all P < 0.01). At 24 h, migration distances in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (169.50 ± 8.48 μm, 141.20 ± 14.88 μm, and 88.98 ± 4.24 μm, respectively) were also significantly shorter than that in the control group (238.00 ± 7.44 μm, all P < 0.001). In SK-MEL-28 cells, migration distances at 12 h after treatment with 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA (115.80 ± 7.61 μm, 123.20 ± 5.47 μm, and 97.88 ± 9.12 μm, respectively) were significantly shorter than that in the control group (203.00 ± 21.40 μm, all P < 0.01). At 24 h, migration distances in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (212.90 ± 2.88 μm, 220.60 ± 8.90 μm, and 187.90 ± 21.74 μm, respectively) were significantly shorter than that in the control group (348.40 ± 15.71 μm, all P < 0.001). Transcriptomic sequencing revealed that β-GPA significantly regulated signaling pathways including estrogen, phospholipase D, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. Western blot analysis showed that, in A375 cells, the relative expression levels of phosphorylated JNK (p-JNK) protein in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (0.88 ± 0.06, 0.85 ± 0.08, and 0.69 ± 0.07, respectively) were significantly lower than that in the control group (1.00 ± 0.07, all P < 0.05). In SK-MEL-28 cells, the relative expression levels of p-JNK protein in the 10, 20, and 40 mmol/L β-GPA treatment groups (0.75 ± 0.09, 0.52 ± 0.08, and 0.50 ± 0.09, respectively) were also significantly lower than that in the control group (1.00 ± 0.06, all P < 0.05). In vivo experiments using the C57BL/6 mouse melanoma lung metastasis model showed that the numbers of melanoma nodules in the 100 mg/kg β-GPA group, 500 mg/kg β-GPA group, and 30 mg/kg dabrafenib group (7.33 ± 0.76, 3.33 ± 1.02, and 5.17 ± 1.08, respectively) were all significantly lower than that in the control group (17.17 ± 1.07, all P < 0.001). Conclusion β-GPA inhibits the migration of melanoma cells, and the underlying mechanism may be related to suppression of the JNK signaling pathway.

Key words: Melanoma, 3-Guanidinopropanoic acid, Mitogen-activated protein kinase, Cell proliferation, Tumor migration

引用本文

刘晨杰 何进康 李佳奕 王凯 马鹏程 李弘扬 李玲珺. 3胍基丙酸抑制黑色素瘤细胞的迁移及其潜在机制研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2026,e20250616. doi:10.35541/cjd.20250616

Liu Chenjie, He Jinkang, Li Jiayi, Wang Kai, Ma Pengcheng, Li Hongyang, Li Lingjun. Effects of 3-guanidinopropionic acid on the migration of melanoma cells and its potential mechanisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology,2026,e20250616. doi:10.35541/cjd.20250616