中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 767-770.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20180738

• 研究报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

特应性皮炎患儿与正常儿童肠道菌群差异性研究

罗瑞静1    刘杰1    彭勇1    王英杰1    武宗琴1    姜珠倩1    李淑1    柴维汉1    李斌2   

  1. 1上海市嘉定区中医医院皮肤科  201899;2上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院皮肤科  200437
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-06 修回日期:2018-10-24 发布日期:2019-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 李斌 E-mail:18930568129@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市进一步加快中医药事业发展三年行动计划(2014—2016年)项目(ZY3-JSFC-1-1005、ZY3-CCCX-3-3050);上海市嘉定区医学重点专科项目(JDYXZDZK-7);上海市嘉定区中医药科研课题计划项目(2014-KY-ZYY-02)

Difference in intestinal microbiome between children with atopic dermatitis and healthy children

Luo Ruijing1, Liu Jie1, Peng Yong1, Wang Yingjie1, Wu Zongqin1, Jiang Zhuqian1, Li Shu1, Chai Weihan1, Li Bin2#br# Li Bin2#br#   

  1. 1Department of Dermatology, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201899, China; 2Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China
  • Received:2018-09-06 Revised:2018-10-24 Published:2019-09-30
  • Contact: Li Bin E-mail:18930568129@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Shanghai Health Planning Commission Further Accelerates the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine Three-year Action Plan (2014 - 2016) Projects (ZY3-JSFC-1-1005, ZY3-CCCX-3-3050); Jiading District Medical Key Specialized Projects, Shanghai (JDYXZDZK-7); Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Project of Jiading District of Shanghai (2014-KY-ZYY-02)

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 探讨特应性皮炎(AD) 患儿与正常儿童肠道菌群的差异。方法 收集2015年4月至2017年4月在上海市嘉定区中医医院皮肤科门诊就诊的AD患儿35例,以27例健康儿童作为对照组。取受试者粪便,提取总DNA后,PCR扩增细菌的16SrRNA基因V3 ~ V4区,应用Illumina Miseq测序平台行高通量测序,分析菌群丰度差异。选择两组丰度排名前15的门、属、种分别比较物种差异,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果 两组肠道菌群主要由厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门、变形菌门、放线菌门组成。在菌门水平,AD组与健康对照组拟杆菌门丰度分别为29.16% ± 19.96%、39.06% ± 15.98%(P = 0.042),梭杆菌门分别为0.06% ± 0.17%、0.50% ± 1.71%(P = 0.041);在菌属水平,两组拟杆菌属丰度分别为23.77% ± 18.08%、33.1% ± 15.75%(P = 0.029);在菌种水平,丰度排名前15的菌种两组间分布差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论 特应性皮炎患儿与正常儿童肠道菌群构成及菌群相对丰度存在一定差异。

关键词: 皮炎, 特应性; 微生物群落; 儿童; 拟杆菌门; 梭杆菌门

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the difference in intestinal microbiome between children with atopic dermatitis (AD) and healthy children. Methods Totally, 35 children with AD were enrolled from the Department of Dermatology, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from April 2015 to April 2017, and 27 healthy children served as control group. Total DNA was extracted from the feces of the subjects, and the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of the bacteria was amplified by PCR. High throughput sequencing was performed using the Illumina Miseq sequencing platform to analyze the diversity of bacterial flora. The top 15 abundant bacteria at phylum, genus, and species levels respectively were selected in and compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The intestinal microbiome in the two groups mainly consisted of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. At the phylum level, the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria was significantly lower in the AD group (29.16% ± 19.96%, 0.06% ± 0.17%) than in the healthy control group (39.06% ± 15.98%, 0.50% ± 1.71%, respectively, P = 0.042, 0.041). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacteroides was significantly lower in the AD group (23.77% ± 18.08%) than in the healthy control group (33.1% ± 15.75%, P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the distribution of the top 15 abundant species between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion There are some differences in the composition of intestinal microbiome and relative abundance of bacteria between children with AD and healthy children.

Key words: Dermatitis, atopic, Microbial consortia, Child, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria

引用本文

罗瑞静 刘杰 彭勇 王英杰 武宗琴 姜珠倩 李淑 柴维汉 李斌. 特应性皮炎患儿与正常儿童肠道菌群差异性研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2019,52(10):767-770. doi:10.35541/cjd.20180738

Luo Ruijing, Liu Jie, Peng Yong, Wang Yingjie, Wu Zongqin, Jiang Zhuqian, Li Shu, Chai Weihan, Li Bin. Difference in intestinal microbiome between children with atopic dermatitis and healthy children[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2019, 52(10): 767-770.doi:10.35541/cjd.20180738