中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 443-445.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4030.2018.06.011

• 研究报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2激光和高频电针打孔治疗多发性皮脂腺囊肿的对比观察

杨光河1,邓祎玮2,刘佳1,程春林3,赵晓丹1,陈君娥4,赵长秀5   

  1. 1. 湖北江汉油田总医院皮肤科
    2. 湖北江汉油田总医院五七院区皮肤科
    3. 湖北省江汉油田总医院(五七)皮肤科
    4. 湖北江汉油田总医院
    5. 湖北江汉油田总医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-02 修回日期:2017-07-22 发布日期:2018-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 杨光河 E-mail:yangguang-he@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会科研基金

Comparison of carbon dioxide laser versus high-frequency electroacupuncture in the treatment of steatocystoma multiplex: a self-controlled clinical study

  • Received:2017-05-02 Revised:2017-07-22 Published:2018-05-30
  • Contact: YANG GuangHe E-mail:yangguang-he@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Hubei Province Health and Family Planning Scientific Research Project

摘要: 目的 比较CO2激光打孔和高频电针打孔辅助钝性剥离治疗多发性皮脂腺囊肿的疗效及安全性。方法 2014年12月至2016年10月,于湖北江汉油田总医院皮肤科招募15例患者进行自身对照研究,分别接受CO2激光或高频电针打孔制造微小通道至囊腔,辅助蚊式血管钳挤出或掏出内容物并钝性剥离囊肿。对比观察不同部位及不同大小皮疹术后的脱痂时间、红斑消退时间、不良反应及复发情况。结果 两种技术治疗相同部位及相似大小皮疹后,其脱痂时间和红斑消退时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CO2激光组治疗不同部位、不同大小皮疹的脱痂时间和红斑消退时间与高频电针组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗时均有轻度疼痛,未发生血肿及继发感染。两组的瘢痕发生率和色素沉着发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访6 ~ 18个月,两组各有1例复发。结论 和高频电针相比,CO2激光打孔辅助钝性剥离治疗多发性皮脂腺囊肿效果好,能一次清除各部位的皮脂腺囊肿。

关键词: 皮脂腺疾病, 激光, 气体, 高频电针打孔, 钝性剥离, 皮脂腺囊肿, 多发性

Abstract: Yang Guanghe, Deng Yiwei, Liu Jia, Cheng Chunlin, Zhao Xiaodan, Chen Jun′e, Zhao Changxiu Department of Dermatology, Hubei Jianghan Oilfield General Hospital, Qianjiang 433121, Hubei, China Correspondence author: Yang Guanghe, Email: yangguang-he@163.com 【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide (CO2) versus high-frequency electroacupuncture based on the assistance of drilling and blunt dissection in the treatment of steatocystoma multiplex. Methods A randomized, self-controlled study was performed in 15 patients. The median line of the body served as the dividing line, and the lesions on the two sides of the median line of the body were randomly divided into 2 groups to be treated with CO2 laser or high-frequency electroacupuncture, which left micropathways into the cyst cavity. After the above treatment, contents in the cysts were squeezed out or drawn out with a mosquito clamp, and the cysts were bluntly dissected. The decrustation time, erythema subsiding time, adverse reactions and recurrence were compared among lesions at different sites or with different sizes. Results For the lesions at the same sites or with similar sizes after treatment, the decrustation time and erythema subsiding time were both significantly shorter in the CO2 laser group than in the high-frequency electroacupuncture group (both P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the decrustation time and erythema subsiding time among lesions at different sites or with different sizes (all P < 0.05). Mild pain occurred in the 2 groups, and no hematoma or secondary infection occurred. There were significant differences in the incidence of scar formation or pigmentation between the 2 groups (both P < 0.05). During the follow-up of 6 - 18 months, relapse occurred in 1 patient in each group. Conclusion Compared with the high-frequency electroacupuncture, CO2 laser assisted by drilling and blunt dissection shows better efficacy in the treatment of steatocystoma multiplex, and it can remove lesions at various sites at one time.

Key words: Sebaceous gland diseases, Lasers, gas, High-frequency electroacupuncture drilling, Blunt dissection, Steatocystoma multiplex

引用本文

杨光河 邓祎玮 刘佳 程春林 赵晓丹 陈君娥 赵长秀. CO2激光和高频电针打孔治疗多发性皮脂腺囊肿的对比观察[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2018,51(6):443-445. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4030.2018.06.011