中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 512-518.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20260059

• 论著·特应性皮炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

[开放获取]    度普利尤单抗/Janus激酶1抑制剂治疗中重度特应性皮炎的1年药物留存分析

秦琬宜1    路永红   唐欣韵1    周思婕1    周培媚2   

  1. 1成都市第二人民医院皮肤科,成都  610021;2中山大学附属第八医院皮肤科,深圳  518033
    秦琬宜现在乐山市中医医院中医美容部,乐山  614000

  • 收稿日期:2026-01-28 修回日期:2026-03-29 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 周培媚 E-mail:zhounipei@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市福田区临床重点专科项目(QZDZK-202407,ZDXKJF-009)

One-year drug survival analysis of dupilumab and Janus kinase 1 inhibitors in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

Qin Wanyi1, Lu Yonghong1, Tang Xinyun1, Zhou Sijie1, Zhou Peimei2   

  1. 1Department of Dermatology, Chengdu Second People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610021, China; 2Department of Dermatology, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518033, China
  • Received:2026-01-28 Revised:2026-03-29 Published:2026-06-05
  • Contact: Zhou Peimei E-mail:zhounipei@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Futian District Key Specialty Funds(QZDZK-202407,ZDXKJF-009)

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 分析度普利尤单抗、Janus 激酶(JAK)1 抑制剂治疗中重度特应性皮炎(AD)患者的 1年药物留存率和治疗中断的潜在预测因素。方法 本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究。收集 2022年5月至2023年10月在成都市第二人民医院皮肤科门诊首次接受度普利尤单抗或JAK1 抑制剂(乌帕替尼或阿布昔替尼)治疗的中重度AD患者数据。采用1∶1倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡组间基线资料,通过生存分析及Cox回归模型分别分析度普利尤单抗组或JAK1 抑制剂组1年药物留存率和停药预测因素,并比较匹配前后不良事件发生情况。结果 度普利尤单抗组246例,男163例(66.3%),女83例(33.7%),年龄(42.95 ± 21.50)岁;JAK1抑制剂组102例,男65例(63.7%),女37例(36.3%),年龄(47.49 ± 18.69)岁。用药1年时,度普利尤单抗组中有101 例(41.1%)患者停药,JAK1 抑制剂组35 例(34.3%)停药。Kaplan-Meier 法分析显示,度普利尤单抗组和 JAK1抑制剂组1年总药物留存率分别为58.0%和65.1%,log-rank检验显示组间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 1.92,P = 0.166)。PSM后两组各纳入93 例,基线资料均衡可比,1年总药物留存率分别为56.6%和61.7%,差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.68,P = 0.409)。停药预测因素分析中,Cox回归分析显示,肥胖(HR = 5.290,95% CI:1.407 ~ 19.880,P = 0.014)是度普利尤单抗组总体停药的独立危险因素;治疗1个月无应答(HR = 3.953,95% CI:1.077 ~ 14.514,P = 0.038)和成年患者(对比青少年患者,HR = 0.211,95% CI:0.067 ~ 0.666,P = 0.008)是度普利尤单抗因无效停药的独立预测因素;未识别出与 JAK1 抑制剂停药相关的预测因素。安全性方面,原始队列中JAK1抑制剂组不良事件发生率(19.6%,20/102)高于度普利尤单抗组[8.9%(22/246),χ2 = 7.73,P = 0.005];PSM后,JAK1抑制剂组与度普利尤单抗组不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义[17.2%(16/93)比9.7%(9/93),χ2 = 2.26,P = 0.132]。结论 度普利尤单抗与JAK1抑制剂治疗中重度AD时,表现出相似的1年总药物留存率,但二者停药原因及不良事件存在差异。肥胖是度普利尤单抗组总体停药的预测因素;治疗1个月无反应和成年患者是因无效而停用度普利尤单抗的预测因素。

关键词: 皮炎, 特应性, 度普利尤单抗, Janus激酶抑制剂, 乌帕替尼, 阿布昔替尼, 药物留存率, 真实世界研究

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the 1-year drug survival rates of dupilumab and Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitors in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and to identify potential predictors of treatment discontinuation. Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Clinical data were collected from patients with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated treatment with dupilumab or JAK1 inhibitors (upadacitinib or abrocitinib) at the Department of Dermatology, Chengdu Second People′s Hospital between May 2022 and October 2023, and were included in a 1-year drug survival analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1∶1 ratio was used to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the 1-year drug survival rates and predictors of treatment discontinuation in the dupilumab group and the JAK1 inhibitor group, respectively, and the incidence of adverse events was compared between the two groups before and after matching. Results The dupilumab group included 246 patients with moderate-to-severe AD (163 males [66.3%] and 83 females [33.7%]), with the age being 42.95 ± 21.50 years; the JAK1 inhibitor group included 102 patients (65 males [63.7%] and 37 females [36.3%]), with the age being 47.49 ± 18.69 years. During the 1-year follow-up, 101 (41.1%) patients discontinued dupilumab, while 35 (34.3%) discontinued JAK1 inhibitors. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 1-year overall drug survival rates were 58.0% in the dupilumab group and 65.1% in the JAK1 inhibitor group, with no significant difference between the two groups by the log-rank test (χ2 = 1.92, P = 0.166). After PSM, 93 patients were included in each group, and the baseline characteristics were comparable; the 1-year overall drug survival rates were 56.6% in the dupilumab group and 61.7% in the JAK1 inhibitor group, with no significant difference observed (χ2 = 0.68, P = 0.409). Regarding predictors of treatment discontinuation, Cox regression analysis identified obesity as an independent risk factor for overall treatment discontinuation in the dupilumab group (HR = 5.290, 95% CI: 1.407 - 19.880, P = 0.014); non-response at 1 month (HR = 3.953, 95% CI: 1.077 - 14.514, P = 0.038) and adulthood (compared with adolescence, HR = 0.211, 95% CI: 0.067 - 0.666, P = 0.008) were independent predictors of treatment discontinuation due to ineffectiveness in the dupilumab group. No predictors of treatment discontinuation were identified in the JAK1 inhibitor group. For safety outcomes, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the JAK1 inhibitor group (19.6% [20/102]) than in the dupilumab group in the original cohort (8.9% [22/246]; χ2 = 7.73, P = 0.005); after PSM, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the JAK1 inhibitor group and the dupilumab group (17.2% [16/93] vs. 9.7% [9/93]; χ2 = 2.26, P = 0.132). Conclusions Dupilumab and JAK1 inhibitors demonstrated comparable 1-year overall drug survival rates in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, while the reasons for treatment discontinuation and adverse event profiles differed between the two therapies. Obesity was identified as a predictor of overall treatment discontinuation in the dupilumab group, while non-response at 1 month and adulthood (compared with adolescence) were predictors of dupilumab discontinuation due to ineffectiveness.

Key words: Dermatitis, atopic, Dupilumab, Janus kinase inhibitors, Upadacitinib, Abrocitinib, Drug survival, Real-world study

引用本文

秦琬宜 路永红 唐欣韵 周思婕 周培媚. [开放获取]    度普利尤单抗/Janus激酶1抑制剂治疗中重度特应性皮炎的1年药物留存分析[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2026,59(6):512-518. doi:10.35541/cjd.20260059

Qin Wanyi, Lu Yonghong, Tang Xinyun, Zhou Sijie, Zhou Peimei. One-year drug survival analysis of dupilumab and Janus kinase 1 inhibitors in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2026, 59(6): 512-518.doi:10.35541/cjd.20260059