中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 461-466.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4030.2019.07.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

患者健康问卷抑郁量表9在痤疮患者中的信度和效度检验

冯霞    叶欣    舒慧玲    余蓓    黎昌强   

  1. 西南医科大学附属医院皮肤科,四川泸州  646000
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-17 修回日期:2019-03-05 出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 黎昌强 E-mail:lcq-1973@163.com

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 in patients with acne

Feng Xia, Ye Xin, Shu HuiLing, Yu Bei, Li Changqiang   

  1. Department of Dermatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Revised:2019-03-05 Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-07-01
  • Contact: Li Changqiang E-mail:lcq-1973@163.com
  • Supported by:
    四川省卫生计生委科研课题(16PJ555);泸州市科技计划项目(2016-S-67)

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 检验患者健康问卷抑郁量表9(PHQ?9)在痤疮患者中的信度和效度。方法 2017年1月至2018年6月在西南医科大学附属医院门诊收集痤疮患者300例,应用PHQ?9及汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)对患者进行问卷调查并记录完成时间,采用美国《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第4版)》(DSM?Ⅳ)临床定式访谈(SCID)作为抑郁“金标准”进行评定。采用Cronbach′s α系数和1周后重测信度对PHQ?9进行信度分析;效度分析采用因子分析、Spearman相关分析和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),并分析PHQ?9在不同分组人群中的筛查效度。结果 共258例痤疮患者完成全部问卷,47例符合抑郁障碍诊断标准。PHQ?9诊断抑郁最佳划界分为9分,此时灵敏度为95.7%,特异度为88.6%,ROC曲线下面积为0.973(95% CI:0.956 ~ 0.990),在不同分组人群中,ROC曲线下面积最低0.886,最高0.955。效度分析显示,PHQ?9总分与HAMD总分的相关系数为0.766,Kappa值为0.530。因子分析共获得2个公因子,分别为认知-情感因子、躯体症状因子,累计方差贡献率为65.52%。信度分析显示,PHQ?9 Cronbach′s α系数为0.851,各条目与量表总分的相关系数为0.550 ~ 0.709,各条目间的相关系数为0.224 ~ 0.654,重测信度为0.824。完成每份PHQ?9的时间为(4.9 ± 1.2) min,完成HAMD的时间为(44.2 ± 5.9) min,差异有统计学意义(t = 108.787,P < 0.001)。结论 PHQ?9应用于痤疮患者具有良好的信度和效度,可用于对痤疮伴抑郁患者初筛,该量表较HAMD具有明显时间及人力优势,更便于在临床中实施。

关键词: 寻常痤疮, 抑郁, 问卷调查, 评价研究, 患者健康问卷抑郁量表9, 信度, 效度

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with acne. Methods A total of 300 patients with acne were enrolled from the Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwestern Medical University from January 2017 to June 2018. Questionnaire survey was conducted among these patients to evaluate their depression status with the PHQ-9 and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), and the questionnaire completion time was recorded. The structured clinical interview(SCID) for American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Version) (DSM-Ⅳ) served as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of depression. Reliability analysis of the PHQ-9 was performed using the Cronbach′s α coefficient and one-week test-retest reliability. Factor analysis, Spearman correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for validity analysis of the PHQ-9, and the screening validity was also analyzed in different subgroups. Results A total of 258 patients with acne completed all the survey, and 47 were diagnosed with depressive disorder according to the diagnostic gold standard SCID. An optimal cutoff score of 9 was determined for the diagnosis of depression using the PHQ-9, with a sensitivity of 95.7%, a specificity of 88.6%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.956 - 0.990). In different groups of people, the AUC ranged from 0.886 to 0.955. Validity analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between the total score of PHQ-9 and HAMD was 0.766, and the kappa value was 0.530. Factor analysis revealed that there were two common factors (cognitive-emotion factor and somatic symptom factor), which explained 65.52% of the total variances. As reliability analysis showed, the Cronbach′s α coefficient of the PHQ-9 was 0.851, the correlation coefficients of the 9 items with the total scale score ranged from 0.550 to 0.709, the inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.224 to 0.654, and the test-retest reliability value of the PHQ-9 was 0.824. The time to complete the PHQ-9 (4.9 ± 1.2 minutes) was significantly less than the time to complete HAMD (44.2 ± 5.9 minutes; t = 108.787, P < 0.001). Conclusions The PHQ-9 shows good reliability and validity for the diagnosis of depression in patients with acne, and can be used for preliminary screening of depression in patients with acne. Compared with the HAMD, the PHQ-9 has obvious advantages of being more timesaving and manpower-saving to make it easier to implement in clinic.

Key words: Acne vulgaris, Depression, Questionnaires, Evaluation studies, Patient health questionnaire?9, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号: 

  • R751