Chinese Journal of Dermatology ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 606-610.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of efficacy of intralesional glucocorticoid injection with a needle-free injector for the treatment of keloid

  

  • Received:2014-12-18 Revised:2015-05-11 Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-09-01
  • Contact: Chen Xiao-Dong E-mail:dermatochen@163.com

Abstract:

Wu Xiaoyan*, Fan Hongmei, Chen Xiaodong, Xu Pan, Yao Xiaodong. *Department of Dermatovenereology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China Corresponding author: Chen Xiaodong, Email: dermatochen@163.com 【Abstract】 Objective To compare the efficacy of intralesional glucocorticoid injection with a needle-free injector versus an ordinary injector for the treatment of keloid. Methods A total of 60 patients with keloid were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups by using a random number table to receive intralesional injection of compound betamethasone with a needle-free injector (n = 31) or an ordinary injector (n = 29). The injection was given at a dose of 0.2 ml/cm3 once every 3 weeks for 3 sessions. Parameters for therapeutic efficacy were assessed, adverse reactions were recorded, and clinical pictures were taken before and after each treatment. Statistical analysis was carried out by the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test with the SPSS 19.0 software. Results Compared with the ordinary injector group, the needle-free injector group showed significantly different injection time during the first and second treatment (U = 299.000, 773.500, respectively, both P = 0.000), as well as duration of pain after the first injection (U = 730.000, P = 0.003). After three sessions of treatment, there was a significant difference in the volume, height, hardness of keloid, scores for pain, itching and appearance, and number of injection points between the needle-free injector group and ordinary injector group (U = 295.000, 336.500, 264.000, 464.000, 451.500, 308.000, 233.500, P = 0.001, 0.007, 0.000, 0.041, 0.043, 0.003, 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the interval for lesion recurrence was significantly shorter in the needle-free injector group (11.8 days, 95% CI: 10.96 - 12.6 days) than in the ordinary injector group (21.2 days, 95% CI: 13.96 - 28.45 days). Conclusion Compared with the ordinary injector, the needle-free injector shows better efficiency for the treatment of keloid with decreased difficulty in injection and improved compliance in patients.