中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 661-664.

• 调查报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

中华皮肤科杂志与国际皮肤性病学杂志读者（作者）问卷调查

尚淑贤1,吴晓初1,颜艳1,林敏乐1,苏晓萌1,蒋黎1,马霞1,严桂兰2   

  1. 1. 南京 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院皮肤病研究所
    2. 南京医科院皮研所
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-04 修回日期:2013-03-06 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 吴晓初 E-mail:xiaochuwu@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    中华皮肤科杂志和国际皮肤性病学杂志读者（作者）调查

A questionnaire survey of readers/authors of Chinese Journal of Dermatology and International Journal of Dermatology and Venereology

  • Received:2013-01-04 Revised:2013-03-06 Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-01
  • Contact: WU Xiao-chu E-mail:xiaochuwu@hotmail.com

PDF

12

赞

摘要： 【摘要】 目的 探讨中华皮肤科杂志（简称中皮）和国际皮肤性病学杂志（简称国皮）读者（作者）的分布、阅读习惯和需求以及投稿取向。 方法 设计调查问卷，借助两刊网站进行在线调查，通过随刊发行等进行纸质问卷调查。调查内容包括基本情况、订阅情况、期刊网站、投稿情况和评价情况等。 结果 收回网络问卷647份，纸质问卷104份，共计751份。中皮和国皮的答题者均以31 ~ 40岁居多（41.82%和42.92%），中级职称为主（35.34%和33.82%）。中皮61.24%和国皮58.00%的答题者通过集体订阅纸质版阅读杂志；中皮43.51%和国皮49.67%的答题者倾向于阅读电子版。答题者中，63.50%认为审稿质量和周期影响投稿时对期刊的选择，63.20%则认为是影响因子。最受喜爱的前3个栏目在中皮是论著（50.43%）、病例报告（40.33%）、临床经验（39.93%），在国皮是综述（45.08%）、论著（44.04%）、病例报告（39.90%）。结论 中皮和国皮的读者（作者）以中级职称者为主；接近一半的读者倾向于阅读电子版杂志；审稿质量、刊出周期和影响因子可能是作者投稿时最关心的问题。

关键词: 中华皮肤科杂, 国际皮肤性病学科杂, 问卷调查

Abstract: SHANG Shu-xian, WU Xiao-chu, YAN Yan, LIN Min-le, SU Xiao-meng, JIANG Li, MA Xia, YAN Gui-lan. Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Dermatology and Internatinal Journal of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing 210042, China 【Abstract】 Objective To learn the distribution of, reading habits and demands of, as well as considerations for the selection of journals during manuscript submission in, readers/authors of Chinese Journal of Dermatology （CJD） and International Journal of Dermatology and Venereology （IJDV） through a questionnaire survey. Methods A questionnaire was designed, which contained a series of questions concerning general information of journals, journal subscription, jouranl's website, journal selection during manuscript submission, evaluation of journals, etc. To collect data, the electronic version of the questionnaire was placed on the website of both journals from May to October in 2012, and the print version of the questionnaire was delivered to subscribers of both journals by post in May 2012. Results A total of 751 completed questionnaires were obtained, including 647 electronic and 104 printed questionnaires. Most responders had a middle professional title （35.34% for CJD and 33.82% for IJDV）, and were aged between 31 and 40 years （41.82% for CJD and 42.92% for IJDV）. More than half of the responders（61.24% for CJD and 58.55% for IJDV） read the journals through institutional subscription of print journals. In the case of reading preference, 43.51% of responders of CJD and 49.67% of those of IJDV selected electronic journals. For journal selection during manuscript submission, the responders mainly considered the quality of and median length of time required for manuscript review （63.50%）, followed by impact factor （63.20%）. The three most preferred publication types were original article （50.43%）, case report （40.33%） and clinical experience （39.93%） for CJD, review （45.08%）, original article （44.04%） and case report （39.90%） for IJDV. Conclusions This survey suggests that the readers/authors of CJD and IJDV are predominated by individuals with a middle professional title; nearly half of the readers prefer reading electronic journals. The quality of and median length of time required for manuscript review, as well as impact factor appear to be the three most common factors considered for the selection of journals during manuscript submission.