中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 466-469.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

复方氟米松软膏对特应性皮炎患者经表皮水分丢失量的影响及其临床应用研究

戴鲡瑶1,董雪娇1,柯菲1,齐晓怡2,林茂3,涂彩霞1   

  1. 1. 大连医科大学附属第二医院皮肤科
    2.
    3. 大连医科大学附属第二医院
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-05 修回日期:2012-11-06 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 涂彩霞 E-mail:tucx2003@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    水杨酸对表皮屏障功能影响的研究

Effect of compound flumetasone ointment on transepidermal water loss and its clinical application in patients with atopic dermatitis

  • Received:2012-09-05 Revised:2012-11-06 Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-01
  • Contact: Cai-Xia TU E-mail:tucx2003@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨水杨酸对皮肤屏障功能的影响及其联合氟米松软膏治疗特应性皮炎的疗效。方法特应性皮炎患者64例,选择躯体两侧大小及严重程度相似的皮损,分别外用复方氟米松软膏(0.02%氟米松 + 3%水杨酸)、0.02%氟米松软膏、3%水杨酸软膏及基质软膏;选择患者躯体两侧非皮损区皮肤,分别外用3%水杨酸软膏及基质软膏。均为每日2次,连用3周。使用皮肤生理测试仪检测治疗前及治疗开始后第1、2、3周的经表皮水分丢失量(TEWL),观察治疗前后症状、体征总积分,判断疗效。30例健康人为对照组,选择双前臂屈侧健康皮肤,外用水杨酸及基质软膏,每日2次,连用3周,于用药前、用药后1、3周检测TEWL。结果 健康人皮肤用药前及用药后1、3周,各组TEWL比较,差异无统计学意义。特应性皮炎患者皮损区TEWL在第0、1、2、3周,复方氟米松组分别为(34.26 ± 20.82)、(22.38 ± 16.16)、(17.04 ± 12.74)、(15.34 ± 13.13) g·m-2·h-1,氟米松组分别为(33.02 ± 16.71)、(24.63 ± 17.08)、(20.37 ± 9.53)、(19.06 ± 9.17) g·m-2·h-1,水杨酸组分别为(34.16 ± 18.03)、(26.49 ± 8.59)、(21.91 ± 8.46)、(21.20 ± 9.38) g·m-2·h-1,基质组分别为(33.81 ± 17.11)、(29.80 ± 12.48)、(26.16 ± 8.31)、(25.52 ± 6.05) g·m-2·h-1;治疗前(0周)各组TEWL差异无统计学意义;治疗后各组TEWL下降值经重复测量数据方差分析,差异有统计学意义 (F = 39.57,P < 0.01);随机单位组设计资料方差分析显示,治疗1、2、3周后TEWL下降值复方氟米松组均显著高于氟米松组(P < 0.05),水杨酸组显著高于基质组(P < 0.05或P < 0.01),水杨酸组与氟米松组比较,差异无统计学意义。特应性皮炎患者非皮损区TEWL,水杨酸组在第2、3周下降幅度显著高于基质组(P < 0.05)。复方氟米松软膏组基愈率(53.1%)及有效率(84.4%)均高于氟米松组(分别为34.4%和64.1%),两组比较,基愈率χ2 = 4.57,P < 0.05;有效率χ2 = 6.90,P < 0.01。 结论 3%水杨酸软膏对特应性皮炎患者皮肤屏障功能的损伤具有修复作用,复方氟米松软膏治疗特应性皮炎的疗效优于氟米松软膏。 【关键词】 皮炎,特应性; 皮肤屏障; 水杨酸; 氟米松

关键词: 皮炎,特应性, 皮肤屏障, 水杨酸, 氟米松

Abstract: DAI Li-yao, DONG Xue-jiao, KE Fei, QI Xiao-yi, LIN Mao, TU Cai-xia. Department of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116027, China Corresponding author: TU Cai-xia, Email:tucx2010@sina.com 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of salicylic acid on skin barrier function and the efficacy of salicylic acid combined with flumetasone ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis(AD). Methods Sixty-four patients with AD(including 31 males and 33 females) aged 18 to 58 years were recruited into the present study. Four lesional areas of similar size and severity were selected at the similar body sites of both sides of each patient, and randomly classified into four groups to be topically treated with compound flumetasone ointment(containing 0.02% flumetasone and 3% salicylic acid, compound flumetasone group), flumetasone 0.02% ointment (flumetasone group), salicylic acid 3% ointment (salicylic acid group) and vehicle (control group), respectively; two normal skin areas were chosen from apparently normal skin on the similar body sites of both sides of each patient and topically treated with salicylic acid 3% ointment (salicylic acid group) and vehicle (control group) respectively. All of these preparations were applied twice a day for 3 weeks. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured by a Tewameter MPA580 (Courage & Khazaka, Germany) at the baseline as well as on week 1, 2 and 3 after initiation of treatment. Symptom and sign scores were evaluated before and after the treatment. Meanwhile, two normal skin areas were selected on bilateral forearm of 30 healthy controls and treated with 3% salicylic acid ointment (salicylic acid group) and vehicle (control group) respectively twice a day for 3 weeks, and TEWL was measured before treatment as well as on week 1 and 3 after initiation of treatment. Results In the healthy controls, TEWL value showed no significant difference between the salicylic acid group and control group at any of these time points. As far as the lesional skin was concerned, no statistical difference was observed in TEWL value at the baseline between the four groups ((34.26 ± 20.82) vs. (33.02 ± 16.71) vs. (34.16 ± 18.03) vs. (33.81 ± 17.11) g?m-2?h-1, P > 0.05), but significant difference was noted after treatment (repeated measurement data analysis of variance, F = 39.57, P < 0.01), with the TEWL value being (22.38 ± 16.16), (17.04 ± 12.74), and (15.34 ± 13.13) g?m-2?h-1 respectively in the compound flumetasone group on week 1, 2 and 3, (24.63 ± 17.08),(20.37 ± 9.53),(19.06 ± 9.17) g?m-2?h-1 respectively in the flumetasone group, (26.49 ± 8.59),(21.91 ± 8.46),(21.20 ± 9.38) g?m-2?h-1 respectively in the salicylic acid group, and (29.80 ± 12.48),(26.16 ± 8.31),(25.52 ± 6.05) g?m-2?h-1 respectively in the control group. In detail, the decrease in TEWL value was stronger in the compound flumetasone group than in the flumetasone group on week 1, 2, and 3 (all P < 0.05), in the salicylic acid group than in the control group (P < 0.05 or 0.01), but similar between the flumetasone group and salicylic acid group. In non-lesional skin, the salicylic acid group showed a more intense decrease in TEWL value compared with the control group on week 2 and 3 (both P < 0.05). Both the cure rate and response rate were significantly higher in the compound flumetasone group than in the flumetasone group (53.1% vs. 34.4%, χ2 = 4.57, P < 0.05; 83.1% vs. 64.1%, χ2 = 6.90, P < 0.01). Conclusions The salicylic acid 3% ointment shows a reparative effect on skin barrier in patients with AD, and the compound flumetasone ointment is superior to the flumetasone ointment in the treatment of AD. 【Key words】 Dermatitis, atopic; Skin barrier; Salicylic acid; Flumethasone

Key words: Salicylic acid