中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 572-575.

• 研究报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

两性霉素B和伏立康唑对马尔尼菲青霉菌临床株超微形态影响的研究

张倩影1,梁伶2,曹存巍3,刘栋华4   

  1. 1. 广西皮肤病防治研究所
    2. 南宁广西医科大学附属第一医院皮肤科
    3. 广西医科大学第一附属医院皮肤性病科
    4. 广西医科大学第一附属医院皮肤科
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-01 修回日期:2015-01-08 出版日期:2015-08-15 发布日期:2015-07-30
  • 通讯作者: 梁伶 E-mail:gxmull@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金

Effects of amphotericin B and voriconazole on ultrastructure of a clinical isolate of Penicillium marneffei

2, Dong-Hua LIU   

  • Received:2014-08-01 Revised:2015-01-08 Online:2015-08-15 Published:2015-07-30

摘要:

目的 通过扫描电镜和透射电镜观察马尔尼菲青霉菌临床株经两性霉素B和伏立康唑作用前后超微形态的变化。 方法 采用微量稀释法先测定两性霉素B和伏立康唑对马尼菲青霉菌临床株的最小抑菌浓度(MIC),在MIC和10倍MIC条件下,药物与菌作用24、48、72 h,分别在扫描电镜和透射电镜下观察马尔尼菲青霉菌的超微结构变化。 结果 马尔尼菲青霉菌经两性霉素B作用后,随着药物作用时间延长及浓度增加,扫描电镜下可见到菌体破损,外层剥离、皱缩、断裂及粘连;透射电镜下线粒体变性,细胞核碎裂,细胞膜皱缩,胞质内细胞器消失,细胞壁断裂。经伏立康唑作用后,扫描电镜下可见到菌体破损、皱缩、干瘪、坍塌;透射电镜下均看到胞质内出现许多高密度的电子致密颗粒,线粒体变性,细胞壁表面粗糙,细胞膜皱缩、破损,胞质内各细胞器消失。 结论 两性霉素B和伏立康唑对马尔尼菲青霉菌有明显抗菌作用,均可使其超微结构发生明显变化,与药物浓度及作用时间呈正相关。两种药物相比,两性霉素B对菌细胞损伤更明显。

Abstract:

Zhang Qianying, Liang Ling, Cao Cunwei, Liu Donghua. Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China Corresponding author: Liang Ling, Email: gxmull@163.com 【Abstract】 Objective To observe ultrastructural changes in a clinical isolate of Penicillium marneffei (PM) before and after treatment with amphotericin B or voriconazole by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Methods A microdilution method was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amphotericin B and voriconazole against a clinical isolate of PM. Then, the PM isolate was treated with amphotericin B or voriconazole at their MICs and 10-fold MICs for 24, 48 and 72 hours. The ultrastructural changes in this isolate before and after the treatment were observed by using SEM and TEM. Results After the treatment with amphotericin B, SEM showed that the conidia or yeast cells of the PM isolate were gradually damaged, and their outer layers experienced detachment, shrinkage, breakage and adhesion with the increase in treatment duration and concentrations of amphotericin B; TEM also showed degenerated mitochondria, broken nuclei and cell walls, and shrunken cytoplasmic membrane with disappearance of cytoplasmic organelles. Similarly, the damage, shrinkage, shriveling and collapse of PM cells were seen by using SEM, and TEM showed many high-density electron-dense granules in cytoplasm, degeneration of mitochondria, roughening of cell wall surface, damage and shrinkage of cytoplasmic membrane, and disappearance of cytoplasmic organelles after voriconazole treatment. Conclusions Amphotericin B and voriconazole both had a strong antifungal effect on PM, and could induce evident ultrastructural changes, which were positively associated with treatment duration and concentrations. Moreover, amphotericin B caused more severe damage to PM compared with voriconazole.