中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2022, e20210420.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20210420

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂及其他生物制剂相关矛盾性银屑病的临床进展

陆佳维    鲁严   

  1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院  江苏省人民医院皮肤科,南京  210029
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-01 修回日期:2021-09-09 发布日期:2022-02-08
  • 通讯作者: 鲁严 E-mail:luyan6289@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81872541)

Paradoxical psoriasis induced by tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and other biological agents

Lu Jiawei, Lu Yan   

  1. Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2021-06-01 Revised:2021-09-09 Published:2022-02-08
  • Contact: Lu Yan E-mail:luyan6289@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81872541)

摘要: 【摘要】 肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)抑制剂(TNFi)已成为慢性炎症性疾病患者无法耐受传统治疗或传统治疗失败时的重要选择。2% ~ 5%使用TNFi的患者会诱发银屑病皮损或加重银屑病,TNFi既是治疗银屑病的药物又是诱因时,被称为矛盾性银屑病。矛盾性银屑病与经典银屑病的临床表现类似,但免疫学机制不同。该文概述了矛盾性银屑病的发病机制、临床病理特点和处置流程,同时总结了其他常见生物制剂使用中出现矛盾性银屑病的概况。

关键词: 银屑病, 肿瘤坏死因子α, 生物制剂, 药物毒性, 矛盾性银屑病

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-α inhibitors have become an important choice for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases who were intolerant or poorly responsive to conventional therapies. Studies have shown that psoriasis can develop or be exacerbated in 2% - 5% of patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors, and this phenomenon is called paradoxical psoriasis. Paradoxical psoriasis and classic psoriasis have similar clinical manifestations, but different immunological mechanisms. This review summarizes the pathogenesis, clinicopathological features and management of paradoxical psoriasis, and provides an overview of paradoxical psoriasis following the application of other common biological agents.

Key words: Psoriasis, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, Biological agents, Drug toxicity, Paradoxical psoriasis

引用本文

陆佳维, 鲁严. 肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂及其他生物制剂相关矛盾性银屑病的临床进展[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2022,e20210420. doi:10.35541/cjd.20210420

Lu Jiawei, Lu Yan. Paradoxical psoriasis induced by tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and other biological agents[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology,2022,e20210420. doi:10.35541/cjd.20210420