中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2025, e0220929.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20220929

• 系统综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗大疱性类天疱疮的疗效和安全性系统综述

王彩霞    徐凡    石晶    朱海莲    卢桂玲    王红梅   

  1. 天津市中医药研究院附属医院皮肤科,天津  300120
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-30 修回日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2025-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王红梅 E-mail:13821085895@163.com

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab and dupilumab for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review

Wang Caixia, Xu Fan, Shi Jing, Zhu Hailian, Lu Guiling, Wang Hongmei   

  1. Department of Dermatology, Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin 300120, China
  • Received:2022-12-30 Revised:2024-07-01 Published:2025-05-12
  • Contact: Wang Hongmei E-mail:13821085895@163.com

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 系统回顾分析奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗大疱性类天疱疮(BP)患者的疗效和安全性。方法 检索2009年1月1日至2022年11月30日PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据库及维普数据库中奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗BP的相关文献。主要通过总结分析奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗BP患者后的完全缓解率、部分缓解率、复发率等疗效指标,以及不良反应情况(安全性指标),以评价奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗BP的疗效和安全性。结果 共纳入46篇文献,包括141例BP患者,其中奥马珠单抗治疗65例,度普利尤单抗治疗76例。奥马珠单抗治疗周期为11(5,16)个月,完全缓解42例(64.6%),部分缓解13例(20.0%),不良反应6例(9.2%),死亡2例(3.1%)。度普利尤单抗治疗周期为4(4,5)个月,完全缓解52例(68.4%),部分缓解15例(19.7%),不良反应3例(3.9%),无死亡病例。结论 奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗临床疗效和安全性均较好,但仍需更多的随机对照试验来验证。

关键词: 类天疱疮, 大疱性, 生物制剂, 奥马珠单抗, 度普利尤单抗, 疗效, 安全性

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To systematically review and analyze the efficacy and safety of omalizumab and dupilumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP). Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CBMdisc, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases from January 1, 2009 to November 30, 2022, to collect literature on the treatment of BP with omalizumab and dupilumab. Efficacy indicators included the complete remission rate, partial remission rate, recurrence rate, etc., while adverse reactions served as a safety indicator. Results A total of 46 publications were included, involving 141 BP patients (65 receiving omalizumab therapy and 76 receiving dupilumab therapy). The duration of omalizumab treatment was 11 (5, 16) months; 42 (64.6%) patients achieved complete remission, and 13 (20.0%) achieved partial remission; adverse reactions occurred in 6 (9.2%) patients, and 2 deaths (3.1%) were reported. The duration of dupilumab treatment was 4 (4, 5) months, leading to complete remission in 52 (68.4%) patients, and partial remission in 15 (19.7%); adverse reactions occurred in 3 (3.9%) patients, and no deaths were reported. Conclusions Both omalizumab and dupilumab demonstrated favorable clinical efficacy and safety. However, more randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.

Key words: Pemphigoid, bullous, Biological agents, Omalizumab, Dupilumab, Therapeutic effect, Safety

引用本文

王彩霞 徐凡 石晶 朱海莲 卢桂玲 王红梅. 奥马珠单抗和度普利尤单抗治疗大疱性类天疱疮的疗效和安全性系统综述[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2025,e0220929. doi:10.35541/cjd.20220929

Wang Caixia, Xu Fan, Shi Jing, Zhu Hailian, Lu Guiling, Wang Hongmei. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab and dupilumab for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology,2025,e0220929. doi:10.35541/cjd.20220929