[1] |
Duong TA, Valeyrie⁃Allanore L, Wolkenstein P, et al. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs[J]. Lancet, 2017,390(10106):1996⁃2011. doi: 10.1016/S0140⁃6736(16)30378⁃6.
|
[2] |
Hoetzenecker W, Nägeli M, Mehra ET, et al. Adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: current understanding[J]. Semin Immunopathol, 2016,38(1):75⁃86. doi: 10.1007/s00281⁃015⁃0540⁃2.
|
[3] |
Chung WH, Wang CW, Dao RL. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions[J]. J Dermatol, 2016,43(7):758⁃766. doi: 10.1111/jde. 2016.43.issue⁃7.
|
[4] |
Peter JG, Lehloenya R, Dlamini S, et al. Severe delayed cutaneous and systemic reactions to drugs: a global perspective on the science and art of current practice[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2017,5(3):547⁃563. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01. 025.
|
[5] |
Beeler A, Engler O, Gerber BO, et al. Long⁃lasting reactivity and high frequency of drug⁃specific T cells after severe systemic drug hypersensitivity reactions[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2006,117(2):455⁃462. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.10.030.
|
[6] |
Wang F, Cai R, He D, et al. Serum IFN⁃γ⁃inducible chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are elevated in non⁃immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions[J]. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2016,34(3):236⁃241. doi: 10.12932/AP0679
|
[7] |
Czerkinsky CC, Nilsson LA, Nygren H, et al. A solid⁃phase enzyme⁃linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for enumeration of specific antibody⁃secreting cells[J]. J Immunol Methods, 1983,65(1⁃2):109⁃121. doi: 10.1016/0022⁃1759(83)90308⁃3.
|
[8] |
Su SC, Chung WH. Cytotoxic proteins and therapeutic targets in severe cutaneous adverse reactions[J]. Toxins (Basel), 2014,6(1):194⁃210. doi: 10.3390/toxins6010194.
|
[9] |
Polak ME, Belgi G, McGuire C, et al. In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed⁃type drug hypersensitivity reactions[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2013,168(3):539⁃549. doi: 10.1111/bjd.2013.168.issue⁃3.
|
[10] |
Haw WY, Polak ME, McGuire C, et al. In vitro rapid diagnostic tests for severe drug hypersensitivity reactions in children[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2016,117(1):61⁃66. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.017.
|
[11] |
Klaewsongkram J, Thantiworasit P, Suthumchai N, et al. In vitro test to confirm diagnosis of allopurinol⁃induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2016,175(5):994⁃1002. doi: 10.1111/bjd.2016.175.issue⁃5.
|
[12] |
Porebski G, Pecaric⁃Petkovic T, Groux⁃Keller M, et al. In vitro drug causality assessment in Stevens⁃Johnson syndrome ⁃ alterna⁃tives for lymphocyte transformation test[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2013,43(9):1027⁃1037. doi: 10.1111/cea.2013.43.issue⁃9.
|
[13] |
Chung WH, Hung SI, Yang JY, et al. Granulysin is a key mediator for disseminated keratinocyte death in Stevens⁃Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis[J]. Nat Med, 2008,14(12):1343⁃1350. doi: 10.1038/nm.1884.
|
[14] |
Abe R, Yoshioka N, Murata J, et al. Granulysin as a marker for early diagnosis of the Stevens⁃Johnson syndrome[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009,151(7):514⁃515. doi: 10.7326/0003⁃4819⁃151⁃7⁃200910060⁃00016.
|
[15] |
Wang F, Ye Y, Luo ZY, et al. Diverse of TNF⁃α and CCL27 in serum and blister of Stevens⁃Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis[J]. Clin Transl Allergy, 2018,8:12. doi: 10. 1186/s13601⁃018⁃0199⁃6.
|
[16] |
Ogawa K, Morito H, Hasegawa A, et al. Elevated serum thymus and activation⁃regulated chemokine (TARCCCL17) relates to reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)drug⁃induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2014,171(2):425⁃427. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12948.
|
[17] |
White KD, Chung WH, Hung SI, et al. Evolving models of the immunopathogenesis of T cell⁃mediated drug allergy: the role of host, pathogens, and drug response[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015,136(2):219⁃234. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.050.
|
[18] |
Esser S, Jablonka R, Heinemann FM, et al. Detection of abacavir hypersensitivity by ELISpot method[J]. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets, 2012,11(3):227⁃234. doi: 10.2174/187152812800392751.
|
[19] |
Gibson A, Ogese M, Sullivan A, et al. Negative regulation by PD⁃L1 during drug⁃specific priming of IL⁃22⁃secreting T cells and the influence of PD⁃1 on effector T cell function[J]. J Immunol,2014,192(6):2611⁃2621. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302720.
|
[20] |
Kato K, Kawase A, Azukizawa H, et al. Novel interferon⁃γ enzyme⁃linked immunoSpot assay using activated cells for identifying hypersensitivity⁃inducing drug culprits[J]. J Dermatol Sci, 2017,86(3):222⁃229. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.03.007.
|
[21] |
Adler NR, Aung AK, Ergen EN, et al. Recent advances in the understanding of severe cutaneous adverse reactions[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2017,177(5):1234⁃1247. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15423.
|
[22] |
Barbaud A, Collet E, Milpied B, et al. A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2013,168(3):555⁃562. doi: 10.1111/bjd.2013.168.issue⁃3.
|
[23] |
Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O, Flechet ML, et al. Patch testing in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions,including Stevens⁃Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis[J]. Contact Dermatitis, 1996,35(4):234⁃236. doi: 10.1111/j.1600⁃0536.1996. tb02364.x.
|
[24] |
Agache I, Bilo M, Braunstahl GJ, et al. In vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases⁃⁃allergen provocation tests[J]. Allergy, 2015,70(4):355⁃365. doi: 10.1111/all.2015.70.issue⁃4.
|
[25] |
Pichler WJ, Tilch J. The lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity[J]. Allergy, 2004,59(8):809⁃820. doi: 10.1111/all.2004.59.issue⁃8.
|
[26] |
Cabanas R, Calderon O, Ramirez E, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the lymphocyte transformation test in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms causality assessment[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2018,48(3):325⁃333. doi: 10.1111/cea. 2018.48.issue⁃3.
|
[27] |
Trubiano JA, Strautins K, Redwood AJ, et al. The combined utility of ex vivo IFN⁃gamma release enzyme⁃linked immunoSpot assay and in vivo skin testing in patients with antibiotic⁃associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2018,6(4):1287⁃1296.e1. doi: 10. 1016/j.jaip. 2017.09.004.
|