特应性皮炎患者尘螨特应性斑贴试验结果分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析尘螨变应原不同蛋白浓度的特应性斑贴试验结果，并对诊断价值进行评价。方法 85例特应性皮炎患者，以两个厂家提供的变应原原液进行尘螨变应原的特应性斑贴试验（APT），同时以尘螨变应原的皮肤点刺试验（SPT）及血清特异性IgE测定（SIgE）作为对照，比较APT、SPT、SIgE测定的灵敏度、特异度及阳性预测值，并比较5组不同浓度变应原（3 000、5 000、7 000、10 000、12 000 pnu/g）APT结果，及两个厂家提供的变应原原液间的差异。结果以SIgE为金标准。1组：APT、SPT检测尘螨的灵敏度分别为79.41%、73.53%；特异度分别为76.12%、80.95%；阳性预测值分别为64.29%、67.57%。2组：APT、SPT检测尘螨的灵敏度分别为81.53%、76.02%；特异度分别为77.78%、79.85%；阳性预测值分别为65.09%、66.07%。以SPT为金标准。1组：APT、SIgE检测尘螨的灵敏度分别为78.38%、67.57%；特异度分别为77.42%、84.21%；阳性预测值分别为67.44%、73.53%。2组：APT、SIgE检测尘螨的灵敏度分别为79.25%、61.07%；特异度分别为80.63%、82.54%；阳性预测值分别为69.55%、77.21%。两组试剂间差异无统计学意义。另外，5种不同浓度的阳性率分别为1组：8.24%、22.35%、29.41%、44.71%、41.18%；2组：3.53%、23.53%、31.76%、34.12%、35.29%，两组试剂间差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。而两组试剂的各组间APT阳性率差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05），即尘螨变应原浓度的增加会提高APT阳性率，但当浓度达到一定值后阳性率升高不明显。结论 APT诊断尘螨变应原的灵敏度较高，增加变应原蛋白浓度可提高APT阳性率，但达到适宜浓度后阳性率不再升高。

Abstract:

Fu Yuping, Li Dongning, Wang Lan, Sun Jian, Yan Tiefu, Wang Lili, Du Hongyang Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, Liaoning, China （Fu YP, Li DN, Sun J, Yan TF, Wang LL, Du HY）; Department of Dermatology, The Central Hospital of Xiaogan, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei, China （Wang L） Corresponding author: Li Dongning, Email: ldn000123@sina.com 【Abstract】 Objective To analyze results of atopy patch test （APT） with dust mite allergens at different concentrations in patients with atopic dermatitis （AD）, and to evaluate the diagnostic value of APT. Methods Totally, 85 patients with AD were enrolled into this study. All the patients underwent APT with 5 concentrations （3 000, 5 000, 7 000, 10 000 and 12 000 pnu/g） of dust mite allergens, as well as skin prick test （SPT） with dust mite allergens. Dust mite allergens were obtained from two different manufacturers （group 1 and 2）. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA） was performed to detect allergen-specific immunoglobulin E （SIgE） in sera from these patients. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of APT, SPT and SIgE assay were compared, and the results of APT were compared among different concentrations of allergens and between allergens from different manufacturers. Results When SIgE assay served as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of dust mite allergy were 79.41%, 76.12%, and 64.29% respectively for APT, 73.53%, 80.95% and 67.57% respectively for SPT with group 1 dust mite allergens, and 81.53%, 77.78% and 65.09% respectively for APT, 76.02%, 79.85% and 66.07% respectively for SPT with group 2 allergens. When SPT was regarded as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of dust mite allergy were 78.38%, 77.42%, 67.44% respectively for APT, 67.57%, 84.21%, 73.53% respectively for SIgE assay with group 1 dust mite allergens, 79.25%, 80.63% and 69.55% respectively for APT, 61.07%, 82.54% and 77.21% respectively for SIgE assay with group 2 allergens. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity or positive predictive value of APT or SPT between the two groups of allergens. The positive rate of APT was 8.24%, 22.35%, 29.41%, 44.71% and 41.18% respectively with group 1 allergens at 3 000, 5 000, 7 000, 10 000 and 12 000 pnu/g, and 3.53%, 23.53%, 31.76%, 34.12% and 35.29% respectively with group 2 allergens. No significant differences were observed in the positive rate of APT between group 1 and 2 allergens at same concentrations （all P > 0.05）, but a significant difference was observed in that between different concentrations of group 1 or 2 allergens （both P < 0.05）. The positive rate of APT increased with the increase of allergen concentrations, but stopped rising when the concentrations of group 1 and 2 allergens reached 7 000 pnu/g and 5 000 pnu/g respectively. Conclusions The sensitivity of APT is relatively high for the diagnosis of dust mite allergy. The positive rate of APT increased with the increase in allergen concentrations, but stopped rising when the concentrations reached a certain level.

付玉萍李东宁王兰孙健闫铁夫王丽莉杜红阳. 特应性皮炎患者尘螨特应性斑贴试验结果分析[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2016, 49(1): 40-42.doi:

参考文献 12

［1］	Chung BY, Kim HO, Park CW, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of the serum⁃specific IgE, the skin prick test and the atopy patch test compared with that of the oral food challenge test［J］. Ann Dermatol, 2010, 22（4）: 404⁃411. DOI: 10.5021/ad.2010.22.4.404.
［2］	Akdis CA, Akdis M, Bieber T, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report［J］. Allergy, 2006, 61（8）: 969⁃987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.03.045.
［3］	Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis［J］. Acta Derm Venerol （stockh）, 1980, 92（Suppl）: 44⁃47.
［4］	Verstege A, Mehl A, Rolinck⁃Werninghaus C, et al. The predictive value of the skin prick test weal size for the outcome of oral food challenges［J］. Clin Exp Allergy, 2005, 35（9）: 1220⁃1226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365⁃2222.2005.2324.x.
［5］	Darsow U, Vieluf D, Ring J. Evaluating the relevance of aeroallergen sensitization in atopic eczema with the atopy patch test: a randomized, double⁃blind multicenter study. Atopy Patch Test Study Group［J］. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1999, 40（2 Pt 1）: 187⁃193.
［6］	Junghans V, Gutgesell C, Jung T, et al. Epidermal cytokines IL⁃1beta, TNF⁃alpha, and IL⁃12 in patients with atopic dermatitis: response to application of house dust mite antigens［J］. J Invest Dermatol, 1998, 111（6）: 1184⁃l188.
［7］	Turjanmaa K. "Atopy patch tests" in the diagnosis of delayed food hypersensitivity［J］. Allerg Immunol （Paris）, 2002, 34（3）: 95⁃97.
［8］	杨欢, 肖异珠, 罗晓燕, 等. 特应性斑贴试验在诊断特应性皮炎患儿鸡蛋、牛奶过敏中的价值［J］. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2010, 43（6）: 378⁃381. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412⁃4030.2010.06.003.
	Yang H, Xiao YZ, Luo XY, et al. Application of atopy patch test in diagnosing egg and milk allergy among children with atopic dermatitis［J］. Chin J Dermatol, 2010, 43（6）: 378⁃381. DOI: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0412⁃4030.2010.06.003.
［9］	Mitchell EB, Crow J, Chapman MD, et al. Basophils in allergen⁃induced patch test sites in atopic dermatitis［J］. Lancet, 1982, 1（8264）: 127⁃130. DOI: 10.1016/S0140⁃6736（82）90379⁃8.
［10］	Langeveld⁃Wildschut EG, Bruijnzeel PL, Mudde GC, et al. Clinical and immunologic variables in skin of patients with atopic eczema and either positive or negative atopy patch test reactions［J］. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2000, 105（5）: 1008⁃1016. DOI: 10.1067/mai. 2000.106544.
［11］	Niggemann B, Reibel S, Wahn U. The atopy patch test （APT）: a useful tool for the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis［J］. Allergy, 2000, 55（3）: 281⁃285. DOI: 10.1034/j.1398⁃ 9995.2000.00464.x.
［12］	Ingordo V, Dalle Nogare R, Colecchia B, et al. Is the atopy patch test with house dust mites specific for atopic dermatitis?［J］. Dermatology, 2004, 209（4）: 276⁃283. DOI: 10.1159/000080848.