中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 99-102.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

瘢痕旁和瘢痕下扩张器埋植治疗17例胸部瘢痕疙瘩

陈晓栋1,顾黎雄2,吴晓琰2,沈聪聪3,赵洪瑜1   

  1. 1. 南通大学附属医院皮肤科
    2. 南通大学附属医院
    3. 南通大学医学院;南通大学附属医院皮肤科
  • 收稿日期:2010-05-10 修回日期:2010-06-16 出版日期:2011-02-15 发布日期:2011-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈晓栋 E-mail:dermatochen@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    南通市社会发展科技计划

Treatment of keloids on anterior chest by implantation of tissue expanders adjacent to or beneath keloid tissues: 17 case report

  • Received:2010-05-10 Revised:2010-06-16 Online:2011-02-15 Published:2011-02-10
  • Contact: Chen Xiao-Dong E-mail:dermatochen@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨瘢痕旁和瘢痕下扩张器埋植治疗前胸部大面积瘢痕疙瘩的疗效。方法 从2006年3月至2009年6月,17例前胸部大面积瘢痕疙瘩患者共接受21个扩张器埋植。瘢痕面积最大15.7 cm × 5.5 cm,最小4.5 cm × 3.0 cm。其中瘢痕旁埋植12个,瘢痕下埋植9个。瘢痕旁埋植扩张器容量70 ~ 400 ml,瘢痕下埋植80 ~ 500 ml。经6 ~ 8周注水扩张后,行瘢痕疙瘩切除、扩张器取出和扩张皮瓣转移术,同时给予术中即时皮内注射复方倍他米松注射液、术后浅表电子束照射联合治疗,随访12 ~ 50个月。结果 除1个扩张器瘢痕下埋植后感染导致提前取出手术失败外,余20个扩张器均顺利完成整个治疗过程。主要并发症为扩张器外露4个,其中瘢痕旁1个,瘢痕下埋植3个,但未影响二期手术。扩张不满意2个,其中瘢痕旁和瘢痕下各1个。除2例复发外,余15例自觉症状均明显缓解,效果满意。2例复发患者均为扩张不满意,缝合时切口张力较大、且术后延期拆线者。结论 瘢痕旁和瘢痕下扩张器埋植为治疗前胸部大面积瘢痕疙瘩的较为理想的选择方法。切口缝合的张力是决定瘢痕疙瘩术后是否复发的关键。

关键词: 放射疗法

Abstract:

Objective To observe and compare the efficacy and safety of implantation of tissue expanders adjacent to or under keloid tissues for large keloids on anterior chest. Methods Between Mar 2006 and June 2009, a total of 17 patients with large keloid lesions on anterior chest received treatment with 21 tissue expanders, among which 12 were placed under the normal skin adjacent to keloids, and 9 were inserted under the keloid lesions. The scar size varied from 4.5 cm × 3.0 cm to 15.7 cm × 5.5 cm. The capacity was 70 to 400 ml for expanders adjacent to the keloid tissue, 80 to 500 ml for those beneath the keloid tissues. After tissue expansion for 6 to 8 weeks, the expander was removed and keloid lesions were resected followed by the repair of defect with expanded flaps. Further more, the patients received intraoperative local intradermal injection of betamethasone and postoperative superficial electron beam irradiation with divided doses of 7 Gy in 3 consecutive days within 1 week after the surgery. Follow-up varied from 12 to 50 months. Results Twenty expanders, except 1 expander pocket which was removed ahead of time due to infection, were implanted successfully during the whole course of treatment. The main complication was expander exposure in 4 patients, including 1 expander adjacent to the keloids and 3 under keloid lesions, which showed no significant influence on secondary operation. Fifteen patients reported relief of symptoms and achieved satisfactory outcomes, while 2 patients, including 1 treated with expanders adjacent to the keloids and 1 with expanders under the keloid tissue, showed great suture tension and experienced delayed stitch removal followed by the recurrence of keloids after the operation. Conclusions The implantation of tissue expanders under the adjacent normal skin or keloid lesions is an ideal treatment option for large keloids on anterior chest. Regional suture tension is a direct contributor to the recurrence of keloid formation after surgical excision.

Key words: Radiotherapy