特比萘芬体外抗丝状真菌药物敏感试验:菌体不同形态对MIC的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察特比萘芬对部分深部丝状真菌和皮肤癣菌的MIC及分别接种未发芽孢子、发芽孢子和菌丝对MIC的影响。方法参考M38-P(丝状真菌稀释法抗真菌药物敏感性试验参考方案)试验方案及其改进方案,测定特比萘芬对7株曲霉、5株着色真菌、4株波氏假阿利什霉、4株尖端赛多孢子菌及5株皮肤癣菌的未发芽孢子、发芽孢子或菌丝的MIC,并比较相互间的差异。结果受试菌株以未发芽孢子形态接种时,曲霉MIC范围为≤0.03~0.5μg/mL,暗色真菌的MIC范围为≤0.03~0.06μg/mL,波氏假阿利什霉及尖端赛多孢子菌的MIC均>16μg/mL,皮肤癣菌的MIC均≤0.03μg/mL,提示上述菌株中除波氏假阿利什霉及尖端赛多孢子菌外,其余菌株体外均对特比萘芬敏感。所有受试菌中,除杂色曲霉和疣状瓶霉接种发芽孢子时MIC与接种菌丝时的MIC相差4倍外,其余菌株接种发芽孢子或菌丝悬液时的MIC与接种孢子时的MIC差异无显著性。结论受试曲霉、暗色真菌及皮肤癣菌体外均对特比萘芬敏感或较敏感。在丝状真菌的特比萘芬体外药物敏感试验中,接种易于获取并易于量化的未发芽孢子时的MIC可以反映特比萘芬体外对发芽孢子及菌丝的抗菌活性。

关键词: 抗生素类,抗真菌, 微生物敏感性试验, 真菌, 菌丝, 孢子,真菌

Abstract: Objective To compare the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of germinated, ungerminated conidia and hyphae of some filamentous fungi and dermatophytes to terbinafine. Methods The MICs of terbinafine for 7 isolates of Aspergillus spp., 5 isolates of dematiaceous fungi, 4 isolates of Pseudallescheria boydii, 4 isolates of Scedosporium apiospermum and 5 isolates of dermatophytes were examined using the NCCLS M38-P microdilution method. The isolates were inoculated in three different forms, ungerminated conidia, germinated conidia and hyphae respectively, in the tests. Results The MICs of terbinafine for the isolates of Aspergillus spp., dematiaceous fungi, Pseudallescheria boydii, Scedosporium apiospermum, and dermatophytes were ≤0.03~0.5 μg/mL, ≤0.03~0.06 μg/mL, >16 μg/mL, >16 μg/mL, and ≤0.03 μg/mL, respectively. The MICs did not show significant differences among the ungerminated conidia and the germinated conidia for all the isolates tested except A.versicolor and Phialophora verrucosa. Conclusions Terbinafine is effective against the isolates of Aspergillus spp., dematiaceous fungi and dermatophytes in vitro except Pseudallescheria boydii and Scedosporium apiospermum. The MIC of terbinafine obtained with ungerminated conidia may reflect the antifungal activity of terbinafine against germinated conidia and hyphae of some filamentous fungi in vitro.

Key words: Antibiotics, antifungal, Microbial sensitivity tests, Fungi, Hyphae, Spores, fungal

曾敬思, 郑岳臣, 邬焱卿, 谭志建, 连昕. 特比萘芬体外抗丝状真菌药物敏感试验:菌体不同形态对MIC的影响[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2004, 37(8): 452-454.

ZENG Jing-si, ZHENG Yue-chen, WU Yan-qing, TAN Zhi-jian, LIAN Xin. Effect of Hyphal and Conidial form on the in vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Some Filamentous Fungi to Terbinafine[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2004, 37(8): 452-454.

参考文献

[1] Jessup CJ, Warner J, Isham N, et al. Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes:establishing a medium for inducing conidialgrowth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol, 2000, 38:341-344.
[2] Jessup CJ, Ryder NS, Ghannoum MA. An evaluation of the in vitro activity of terbinafine. Med Mycol, 2000, 38:155-159.
[3] Ryder NS. Activity of terbinafine against serious fungal pathogens.Mycoses, 1999, 42 Suppl 2:115-119.
[4] McGinnis MR, Pasarell L. In vitro evaluation of terbinafine and itraconazole against dematiaceous fungi. Med Mycol, 1998, 36:43-246.
[5] Manavathu EK, Cutright J, Chandrasekar PH. Comparative study of susceptibilities of germinated and ungerminated conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus to various antifungal agents. J Clin Microbiol,1999, 37:858-861.
[6] Pujol I, Fernandez-Ballart J, Guarro J. Effect of inoculum form on in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2001, 47:715-718.
[7] Guarro J, Llop C, Aguilar C, et al. Comparison of in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of conidia and hyphae of filamentous fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1997, 41:2760-2762. [8]Manavathu EK, Alangaden GJ, Lerner SA. A comparative study of the broth micro- and macro-dilution techniques for the determination of the in vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus. Can J Microbiol, 1996, 42:960-964.
[8] Manavathu EK,Alangaden GJ,Lerner SA.A comparative study of the broth micro- and macro-dilution techniques for the determina-tion of the in uitro xusceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus. Can J Microbiol,1996,42:960-964.anavathu EK, Alangaden GJ, Lerner SA. A comparative study of the broth micro- and macro-dilution techniques for the determina-tion of the in uitro xusceptibility of A spergillus fumigatus. Can JMicrobiol, 1996,42
[9] 李晋波,刘维达.特比萘芬对白念珠菌酵母相和菌丝相抗菌活性的比较.中华皮肤科杂志,2000,33:53-54.

[1]	徐玉亭郑文倩高露娟孙毅李琳芸李明曾同祥. 光动力疗法单用或联合抗真菌药物对游离态及形成生物膜的皮炎外瓶霉凋亡的影响[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2018, 51(7): 515-518.
[2]	江丽刘倩张新翠龚春燕. 12种抗菌药物对痤疮丙酸杆菌的体外抗菌活性研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2018, 51(6): 453-455.
[3]	冯雨苗吴丽娟王淼淼孙澜曾学思沈永年吕桂霞刘维达. Microsphaeropsis arundinis引起面部皮肤暗色丝孢霉病一例[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2018, 51(5): 382-384.
[4]	孙铭艳吴倩倩王保强王楠刘言霞陶元勇. 脓肿分枝杆菌16S rRNA检测及生物学特性研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2018, 51(12): 901-904.
[5]	陈珊珊周剑峰廖勇李海涛王瑞丽巴根吕雪莲杨蓉娅. Ras1、Rac1、Rho1基因在阿萨希毛孢子菌酵母相和菌丝相中的表达差异[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2017, 50(3): 207-210.
[6]	高诗燕路永红陈涛王珊珊何丽莎单雨婷周培媚瓦庆彪吴波李林陈前明保勇尹亚菲陆玲. 夫西地酸对寻常痤疮患者皮损表皮葡萄球菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌的体外抗菌作用研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2016, 49(9): 658-659.
[7]	王晓明薛峰郑捷. 副银屑病皮损及外周血TCRγ基因重排的检测及其临床意义探讨[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2016, 49(8): 568-572.
[8]	冯佩英席丽艳. 加强对新现临床真菌感染的认识[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2016, 49(7): 451-455.
[9]	陈瑶董碧麟童中胜李东升. 湖北地区须毛癣菌复合体的分子鉴定[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2016, 49(11): 796-800.
[10]	彭程孙弦刘栋华. 左旋多巴对马尔尼菲青霉黑素合成以及药敏的影响[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2015, 48(2): 116-119.
[11]	马英刘晔王倩倩吴湜杨洋黄海辉项蕾红. 夫西地酸对痤疮丙酸杆菌的体外抗菌活性研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2014, 47(11): 823-825.
[12]	冉玉平. 用转化医学理念指导真菌病临床与实验室实践[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2013, 46(8): 535-537.
[13]	江文董玲玲陈兴平. 纳米金基因芯片技术快速鉴定常见浅部致病真菌[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2013, 46(6): 437-439.
[14]	陆晟张振费烨陈向东. 长脉宽Nd:YAG激光治疗甲真菌病疗效观察[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2013, 46(2): 105-108.
[15]	王丽惠艳张丽娟张巧巧邓淑文帕丽达?阿布利孜王慧. 艾滋病患者白念珠菌ERG11基因突变的研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2012, 45(1): 32-34.