中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 899-906.doi: 10.35541/cjd.20190210

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

微针注射透明质酸治疗敏感性皮肤的自身半脸对照研究

陈勇军    杨赛    艾菁    黄莉宁    严婷婷    钟益萍    杨斌   

  1. 南方医科大学皮肤病医院  广东省皮肤病医院美容科,广州  510091
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-08 修回日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 杨斌 E-mail:yangbin101@hotmail.com

Microneedle-mediated intradermal injection with hyaluronic acid for the treatment of sensitive skin: a split-face study

Chen Yongjun, Yang Sai, Ai Jing, Huang Lining, Yan Tingting, Zhong Yiping, Yang Bin   

  1. Department of Cosmetic Dermatology, Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Dermatology Hospital, Guangzhou 510091, China 
  • Received:2019-01-08 Revised:2019-09-10 Published:2019-12-02
  • Contact: Yang Bin E-mail:yangbin101@hotmail.com

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 探讨微针注射透明质酸治疗敏感性皮肤的临床有效性及安全性。方法 选取2018年1 - 6月南方医科大学皮肤病医院美容科门诊确诊的53例21 ~ 54岁女性面部敏感性皮肤患者,采用随机数字生成器结合余数法分为3组。高压喷注组23例,右侧喷注透明质酸(治疗侧),左侧喷注生理氯化钠溶液(对照侧),每2周1次;微针注射组15例,右侧注射透明质酸(治疗侧),左侧注射生理氯化钠溶液(对照侧),每4周1次;联合治疗组15例,右侧微针注射透明质酸(治疗侧),左侧高压喷注透明质酸(对照侧),每4周1次;3组均连续治疗4次。首次治疗前及末次治疗后2周,用VISIA皮肤检测仪检测左右侧面部皮肤红斑及毛孔分值,行乳酸刺痛试验,计算乳酸刺痛试验阳性率,同时评价皮肤敏感程度,包括瘙痒感、干燥感、红斑、脱屑等的严重程度。末次治疗后2周,医师与患者共同评价面部整体美容效果改善评分。记录术中及术后的不良反应。统计分析采用配对t检验、Wilcoxon符号秩和检验及χ2检验等。结果 末次治疗后2周,高压喷注组治疗侧毛孔分值改善疗效优于对照侧(t = 2.19,P = 0.03),而治疗侧与对照侧红斑分值改善差异无统计学意义(t = 1.10,P = 0.27);微针注射组治疗侧红斑及毛孔改善均优于对照侧(t = 2.47、3.02,均P = 0.01);联合治疗组治疗侧和对照侧VISIA红斑分值分别为0.59 ± 0.25、0.85 ± 0.31,且治疗侧红斑改善疗效优于对照侧(t = 5.02,P < 0.01),而毛孔改善分值差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。末次治疗后2周,3组患者面部治疗侧和对照侧瘙痒感、干燥感、脱屑症状均较首次治疗前有显著改善(均P < 0.05),但红斑严重程度仅微针注射组和联合治疗组治疗侧较首次治疗前显著改善(Z = -2.236、-2.887,均P < 0.05),且末次治疗后2周微针注射组和联合治疗组治疗侧红斑严重程度低于对照侧(Z = -2.646、-2.887,均P < 0.05)。末次治疗后2周,微针注射组治疗侧乳酸刺痛试验阳性率较首次治疗前显著降低(χ2 = 4.821,P = 0.028),余差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。治疗中及治疗后均未出现严重不良反应。结论 微针注射透明质酸能有效改善敏感性皮肤的红斑、毛孔及敏感症状,安全性佳。

关键词: 注射, 喷射; 透明质酸; 敏感性皮肤; 微针注射; 高压喷注; 自身半脸对照研究

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of microneedle-mediated intradermal injection with hyaluronic acid for the treatment of sensitive skin. Methods A total of 53 female patients aged 21 - 54 years and diagnosed with sensitive skin were enrolled from Department of Cosmetic Dermatology, Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University from January to June in 2018, and were divided into 3 groups by using a random number generator and a residue-based method: high-pressure jet injection group (n = 23) receiving high-pressure jet injection with hyaluronic acid on the right side of the face (treatment side) and high-pressure jet injection with 0.9% sodium chloride solution on the left side of the face (control side) once every 2 weeks, microneedle injection group (n = 15) receiving microneedle-mediated injection with hyaluronic acid on the right side of the face (treatment side)and microneedle-mediated injection with 0.9% sodium chloride solution on the left side of the face (control side) once every 4 weeks, combination group (n = 15) receiving microneedle-mediated injection with hyaluronic acid on the right side of the face (treatment side) and high-pressure jet injection with hyaluronic acid on the left side of the face (control side) once every 4 weeks. All the patients in the above 3 groups received 4 consecutive sessions of treatment. Before the initial treatment and 2 weeks after the final treatment, erythema and skin pore scores were determined on the right and left sides of the face by using VISIA facial imaging system, lactic acid stinging test was performed, and skin sensitivity including severity of itching, dryness, erythema and scaling was evaluated. Two weeks after the final treatment, the overall improvement was evaluated with the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS)by clinicians and patients. Adverse reactions were recorded during and after treatment. Statistical analysis was carried out by using paired t test, Wilcoxon sign rank sum test and chi-square test. Results Two weeks after the final treatment, the improvement of skin pore score in the treatment side was superior to that in the control side in the high-pressure jet injection group (t = 2.19, P = 0.03), while no significant difference in the improvement of erythema score was observed between the treatment side and control side(t = 1.10, P = 0.27); in the microneedle injection group, the improvement of erythema and skin pore scores was greater in the treatment side than in the control side (t = 2.47, 3.02, both P = 0.01); in the combination group, the VISIA erythema score in the treatment and control sides was 0.59 ± 0.25 and 0.85 ± 0.31 respectively, the improvement of erythema score in the treatment side was superior to that in the control side (t = 5.02, P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference in the improvement of skin pore score between the treatment side and control side (P > 0.05). Two weeks after the final treatment, the severity of itching, dryness and scaling was significantly improved in both the treatment and control sides in the 3 groups compared with those before the initial treatment (P < 0.05), while the severity of erythema was significantly improved only in the treatment side in the microneedle injection group and combination group when compared with that before the initial treatment (Z = -2.236, -2.887, respectively, both P < 0.05). Moreover, both the microneedle injection group and combination group showed significantly decreased severity of erythema in the treatment side compared with that in the control side two weeks after the final treatment (Z = -2.646, -2.887, respectively, both P < 0.05). Two weeks after the final treatment, the positive rate of the lactic acid stinging test significantly decreased in the treatment side compared with that before the initial treatment in the microneedle injection group (χ2 = 4.821, P = 0.028), but showed no significant changes in the other groups (all P > 0.05). No severe adverse reactions were observed during or after the treatment. Conclusion Microneedle intradermal injection with hyaluronic acid can effectively and safely improve erythema, skin pore and sensitive symptoms in patients with sensitive skin.

Key words: Injections, jet, Hyaluronic acid, Sensitive skin, Microneedle- mediated injection, High-pressure jet, Split-face study

引用本文

陈勇军 杨赛 艾菁 黄莉宁 严婷婷 钟益萍 杨斌. 微针注射透明质酸治疗敏感性皮肤的自身半脸对照研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2019,52(12):899-906. doi:10.35541/cjd.20190210

Chen Yongjun, Yang Sai, Ai Jing, Huang Lining, Yan Tingting, Zhong Yiping, Yang Bin. Microneedle-mediated intradermal injection with hyaluronic acid for the treatment of sensitive skin: a split-face study[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2019, 52(12): 899-906.doi:10.35541/cjd.20190210