中华皮肤科杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 359-360.

• 研究报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

CD1a、CD68在继发性瘢痕疙瘩中的表达及意义

郭英军1,王雅坤2,王凯波2,金光玉3,赵玉铭2   

  1. 1. 沈阳市中国医科大学附属盛京医院皮肤科
    2. 沈阳 中国医科大学附属第一医院皮肤科
    3. 沈阳中国医科大学附属第一医院皮肤科
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-27 修回日期:2011-08-16 出版日期:2012-05-15 发布日期:2012-05-03
  • 通讯作者: 赵玉铭 E-mail:ymzhaodc05@yahoo.com
  • 基金资助:

    辽宁省教育厅高等学校科研项目;沈阳市科学技术计划

Expressions of CD1a and CD68 in secondary keloid

  • Received:2011-06-27 Revised:2011-08-16 Online:2012-05-15 Published:2012-05-03

摘要:

目的 探讨继发性瘢痕疙瘩皮损中表皮朗格汉斯细胞(LC)和真皮CD68阳性组织细胞的分布和密度。方法 取30例继发性瘢痕疙瘩患者的皮损、14例正常人皮肤组织切片进行CD1a和CD68免疫组化染色。以测微尺标定目镜方格计数方格内阳性细胞数,计算出单位面积内细胞的密度。组间比较采用SPSS软件进行 Student t检验。结果 在继发性瘢痕疙瘩表皮内CD1a阳性LC密度为(61 ± 49)个/mm2,正常表皮为(258 ± 61)个/mm2,两组比较,t = 9.88,P < 0.01;继发性瘢痕疙瘩真皮CD1a阳性细胞密度为(40 ± 65)个/mm2。继发性瘢痕疙瘩表皮中无CD68阳性细胞,真皮内CD68阳性组织细胞密度为(287 ± 73)/mm2,正常皮肤为(290 ± 22)个/mm2,两组比较,t = 0.02,P > 0.05。继发性瘢痕疙瘩真皮浅层CD68阳性组织细胞占真皮中所有细胞的62% ± 12%,而正常皮肤为70% ± 14%,两组比较,t = 2.66,P < 0.05。 结论 继发性瘢痕疙瘩表皮中LC减少,无CD68阳性的细胞。真皮中LC增多;真皮浅层CD68阳性组织细胞占真皮中所有细胞的比例下降。

关键词: 真皮巨噬细胞

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the distribution and density of Langerhans cells and dermal CD68 positive histiocytes in lesions of secondary keloid. Methods Tissue specimens were resected from the lesions of 30 patients with secondary keloid and normal skin of 14 human controls. Immunohistochemistry was performed to observe the expressions of CD68 and CD1a in these specimens. A micrometer was used to count the number of positively stained cells per unit area. The Student's t test was conducted for data analysis by using the SPSS software. Results The density of CD1a+ Langerhans cells was (61 ± 49) cells/mm2 in the epidermis of secondary keloid lesions, (258 ± 61) cells/mm2 in the control epidermis, and (40 ± 65) cells/mm2 in the dermis of keloid lesions. CD68+ cells were absent in the epidermis of keloid lesions. Significant differences were observed in the density of CD1a+ Langerhans cells between the lesional and normal control epidermis (t = 9.88, P < 0.001) and in the percentage of CD68+ cells in nucleated cells between the superficial dermis of lesions and control skin (62% ± 12% vs. 70% ± 14%, t = 2.66, P < 0.05). The density of dermal CD68+ histiocytes was similar between the lesions and control skin ((287 ± 73) cells/mm2 vs. (290 ± 22) cells/mm2, t = 0.02, P > 0.05). Conclusions In keloid lesions, Langerhans cells decrease in the epidermis but increase in the dermis, CD68+ histiocytes are absent in the epidermis, and reduced in the dermis with a declined percentage in nucleated cells.

Key words: macrophages